KNOWLEDGE

Working with thoughts

Working with a thought means checking evidence, alternatives and the next behavior, not forcing positivity.

EVIDENCEmoderate
SAFETYmedium
CLAIMS1
REVIEWaudited stage32

KNOWLEDGE UNIVERSE

Stress, emotions and thoughts

Stress mapping, calm breathing, emotions, thoughts, beliefs and a safe return after a harder day.

9topics3protocols3experiments
Open the full area →

NEXT SMALL STEP

Micro-step

write the automatic thought

You can do this without starting a full protocol or experiment.

Save what you noticed This micro-step comes from this topic's own action list. No extra relationship is inferred.

What you can do

  1. write the automatic thought
  2. find evidence for and against it
  3. create a more useful thought
  4. choose a small experiment

TOPIC DEPTH / SELF-OBSERVATION

From knowledge to self-observation

This layer organizes the existing topic rules. It does not add new claims or diagnoses.

v1
NEXT SMALL STEPRecord one observation from the last 24 hours and choose the smallest safe step.

How to observe

The minimum needed for meaningful self-observation.

your own observationyour own rating on a 1-5 scale

Topic boundaries

  • the bot does not provide therapy for disorders or trauma
  • do not invalidate emotions

Data limitations

  • Conclusions from a small number of check-ins are hypotheses.
  • User self-report may be incomplete or variable.
  • The app observes patterns; it does not confirm causes.

Interpretation limitations

  • Do not use this for diagnosis or treatment.
  • Do not promise an outcome or health improvement.
  • Do not strengthen wording beyond the current level of source verification.
  • If the user describes a health risk or crisis, the safety router takes priority.

Source limitations

  • Sources require manual verification before strong claims are allowed.
EVIDENCE POLICY

Use for education and self-observation, not diagnosis or treatment.

WHEN CONFIDENCE IS LOW

Suggest a small safe step and encourage observation rather than a radical change.

Human review requiredMetadata and source content are separate review stages. This profile does not unlock strong scientific wording.

EVIDENCE LAYER

Sources and limitations

1public source cards

Sources and conclusions require cautious language. This is education and self-observation, not diagnosis or treatment.

1sources assigned in the catalog
1public sources with metadata
0sources after human review in the project
0sources unlocking strong claims
Bibliographic metadata is separate from content review. Checked metadata does not unlock strong claims.
scoping review2024

Cognitive Restructuring during Depressive Symptoms: A Scoping Review

Bruno Santos; Lara Pinho; Maria José Nogueira; Regina Pires; Carlos Sequeira; Pilar Montesó-Curto

Metadata checked - Content review pending

Scope: The review concerns cognitive restructuring in the context of depressive symptoms. NeuroHackingApp does not use this source for diagnosis or treatment, only as cautious educational background.

Limitations: Use as educational background. Do not create diagnoses or medical recommendations.

Open source ↗
Open Evidence Library →

NEUROHACKINGAPP.COM

Less chaos. More clarity.

Knowledge connects here with protocols, experiments and your own self-observation.

Explore the knowledge base