EVIDENCE UNIVERSE / TRANSPARENCY FIRST
We do not say
"proven"
without evidence.
Here you can see where platform materials come from, what we actually checked and what a source does not yet allow us to claim. Bibliographic metadata and scientific scope review are two separate stages.
See sources ↓with verified metadataMETADATA CHECKED
for strong claimsHUMAN REVIEW
content and scope reviewREVIEW QUEUE
strong claimsSTRONG CLAIMS
IMPORTANT DISTINCTION
Metadata verified do not mean claim approval.
We check title, authors, year, DOI or official URL and source type separately. Only a separate review determines how strong the wording in content can be. Until then, the platform keeps cautious wording.
SOURCE EXPLORER
Source library
Loading Evidence Library...
METHOD
How to read this library?
Identity check
We confirm the publication, organization, year and persistent identifier or official URL.
Scope check
We look at population and domain. A physical activity study does not automatically become evidence for every habit.
Claim review
Only a separate review can determine whether a source supports specific wording in the platform.
Safety boundary
NeuroHackingApp remains education and self-observation, not diagnosis, therapy or a medical promise.