KNOWLEDGE

If-then plans

An if-then plan turns a goal into a specific condition and response.

EVIDENCEmoderate
SAFETYlow
CLAIMS1
REVIEWaudited stage32

KNOWLEDGE UNIVERSE

Habits and action

First steps, cues, if-then plans, environment, routines and values - small mechanisms instead of big declarations.

7topics2protocols1experiments
Open the full area →

NEXT SMALL STEP

Micro-step

write: if X, then Y

You can do this without starting a full protocol or experiment.

Save what you noticed This micro-step comes from this topic's own action list. No extra relationship is inferred.

What you can do

  1. write: if X, then Y
  2. choose one trigger
  3. define a 2-minute response
  4. review after 7 days

TOPIC DEPTH / SELF-OBSERVATION

From knowledge to self-observation

This layer organizes the existing topic rules. It does not add new claims or diagnoses.

v1
NEXT SMALL STEPRecord one observation from the last 24 hours and choose the smallest safe step.

How to observe

The minimum needed for meaningful self-observation.

your own observationyour own rating on a 1-5 scale

Topic boundaries

  • the bot does not assume a plan alone is always enough
  • do not create too many plans at once

Data limitations

  • Conclusions from a small number of check-ins are hypotheses.
  • User self-report may be incomplete or variable.
  • The app observes patterns; it does not confirm causes.

Interpretation limitations

  • Do not use this for diagnosis or treatment.
  • Do not promise an outcome or health improvement.
  • Do not strengthen wording beyond the current level of source verification.
  • If the user describes a health risk or crisis, the safety router takes priority.

Source limitations

  • Sources require manual verification before strong claims are allowed.
EVIDENCE POLICY

Use for education and self-observation, not diagnosis or treatment.

WHEN CONFIDENCE IS LOW

Suggest a small safe step and encourage observation rather than a radical change.

Human review requiredMetadata and source content are separate review stages. This profile does not unlock strong scientific wording.

EVIDENCE LAYER

Sources and limitations

2public source cards

Sources and conclusions require cautious language. This is education and self-observation, not diagnosis or treatment.

2sources assigned in the catalog
2public sources with metadata
0sources after human review in the project
0sources unlocking strong claims
Bibliographic metadata is separate from content review. Checked metadata does not unlock strong claims.
meta analysis2025

A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of implementation intentions for pro-environmental behavior adoption

Isabel Carrero; Carmen Valor; Raquel Redondo; Irene Vilà Trepat

Metadata checked - Content review pending

Scope: This source concerns implementation intentions in pro-environmental behavior. Do not use it alone as general evidence for if-then plans across all behavior domains.

Limitations: Use as educational background. Do not create diagnoses or medical recommendations.

Open source ↗
meta analysis2018

Impact of implementation intentions on physical activity practice in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Marco Antonio Vieira da Silva; Thaís Moreira São-João; Valéria Cândido Brizon; Décio Henrique Franco; Fábio Luiz Mialhe

Metadata checked - Content review pending

Scope: The source concerns physical activity in adults; the scope of any conclusion should remain limited to that domain.

Limitations: Use as educational background. Do not create diagnoses or medical recommendations.

Open source ↗
Open Evidence Library →

NEUROHACKINGAPP.COM

Less chaos. More clarity.

Knowledge connects here with protocols, experiments and your own self-observation.

Explore the knowledge base