NeuroHackingApp

KNOWLEDGE

Hvis-så-planer

En hvis-så-plan gør et mål til en specifik betingelse og reaktion.

EVIDENCEmoderate
SAFETYlow
CLAIMS1
REVIEWaudited stage32

KNOWLEDGE UNIVERSE

Vaner og handling

Første trin, signaler, hvis-så-planer, miljø, rutiner og værdier - små mekanismer i stedet for store erklæringer.

7topics2protocols1experiments
Open the full area →

NEXT SMALL STEP

Micro-step

skriv: hvis X, så Y

You can do this without starting a full protocol or experiment.

Save what you noticed This micro-step comes from this topic's own action list. No extra relationship is inferred.

What you can do

  1. skriv: hvis X, så Y
  2. vælg én trigger
  3. definer en reaktion på 2 minutter
  4. gennemgå efter 7 dage

TOPIC DEPTH / SELF-OBSERVATION

From knowledge to self-observation

This layer organizes the existing topic rules. It does not add new claims or diagnoses.

v1
NEXT SMALL STEPRegistrer én observation fra de seneste 24 timer og vælg det mindste sikre trin.

How to observe

The minimum needed for meaningful self-observation.

din egen observationdin egen vurdering på en skala fra 1 til 5

Topic boundaries

  • botten antager ikke, at en plan alene altid er nok
  • lav ikke for mange planer på én gang

Data limitations

  • Konklusioner fra et lille antal check-ins er hypoteser.
  • Brugerens selvrapportering kan være ufuldstændig eller variabel.
  • Appen observerer mønstre; den bekræfter ikke årsager.

Interpretation limitations

  • Brug ikke dette til diagnose eller behandling.
  • Lov ikke et resultat eller en forbedring af helbredet.
  • Gør ikke formuleringerne stærkere end det aktuelle niveau af kildeverifikation.
  • Hvis brugeren beskriver en sundhedsrisiko eller krise, har sikkerhedsrutningen prioritet.

Source limitations

  • Kilder kræver manuel verifikation, før stærke påstande er tilladt.
EVIDENCE POLICY

Brug til læring og selvobservation, ikke diagnose eller behandling.

WHEN CONFIDENCE IS LOW

Foreslå et lille sikkert trin og opmuntre til observation frem for en radikal ændring.

Human review requiredMetadata and source content are separate review stages. This profile does not unlock strong scientific wording.

EVIDENCE LAYER

Sources and limitations

2public source cards

Kilder og konklusioner kræver forsigtigt sprog. Dette er læring og selvobservation, ikke diagnose eller behandling.

2sources assigned in the catalog
2public sources with metadata
0sources after human review in the project
0sources unlocking strong claims
Bibliographic metadata is separate from content review. Checked metadata does not unlock strong claims.
meta analysis2025

A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of implementation intentions for pro-environmental behavior adoption

Isabel Carrero; Carmen Valor; Raquel Redondo; Irene Vilà Trepat

Metadata checked - Content review pending

Scope: This source concerns implementation intentions in pro-environmental behavior. Do not use it alone as general evidence for if-then plans across all behavior domains.

Limitations: Use as educational background. Do not create diagnoses or medical recommendations.

Open source ↗
meta analysis2018

Impact of implementation intentions on physical activity practice in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Marco Antonio Vieira da Silva; Thaís Moreira São-João; Valéria Cândido Brizon; Décio Henrique Franco; Fábio Luiz Mialhe

Metadata checked - Content review pending

Scope: The source concerns physical activity in adults; the scope of any conclusion should remain limited to that domain.

Limitations: Use as educational background. Do not create diagnoses or medical recommendations.

Open source ↗
Open Evidence Library →

NEUROHACKINGAPP.COM

Less chaos. More clarity.

Knowledge connects here with protocols, experiments and your own self-observation.

Explore the knowledge base