KNOWLEDGE
Dopamine and stimuli
The app uses dopamine as a practical shorthand for working with stimuli, rewards and urges, without making neurochemical diagnoses.
EVIDENCEemerging
SAFETYmedium
CLAIMS1
REVIEWaudited stage32
KNOWLEDGE UNIVERSE
Digital stimuli
Phone use, social media and stimuli as an area for designing your own boundaries and micro-experiments.
4topics3protocols3experiments
Open the full area →What you can do
- reduce fast stimuli for 60 minutes
- replace scrolling with an active task
- rate the craving from 1 to 5
- plan a reward after the work block
TOPIC DEPTH / SELF-OBSERVATION
From knowledge to self-observation
This layer organizes the existing topic rules. It does not add new claims or diagnoses.
v1
How to observe
The minimum needed for meaningful self-observation.
your own observationyour own rating on a 1-5 scale
Topic boundaries
- the bot does not claim that it measures dopamine
- do not promise a neurochemical reset
Data limitations
- Conclusions from a small number of check-ins are hypotheses.
- User self-report may be incomplete or variable.
- The app observes patterns; it does not confirm causes.
Interpretation limitations
- Do not use this for diagnosis or treatment.
- Do not promise an outcome or health improvement.
- Do not strengthen wording beyond the current level of source verification.
- If the user describes a health risk or crisis, the safety router takes priority.
Source limitations
- Sources require manual verification before strong claims are allowed.
Use for education and self-observation, not diagnosis or treatment.
Suggest a small safe step and encourage observation rather than a radical change.
Human review requiredMetadata and source content are separate review stages. This profile does not unlock strong scientific wording.
EVIDENCE LAYER
Sources and limitations
0public source cards
Sources and conclusions require cautious language. This is education and self-observation, not diagnosis or treatment.
1sources assigned in the catalog
0public sources with metadata
0sources after human review in the project
0sources unlocking strong claims
Bibliographic metadata is separate from content review. Checked metadata does not unlock strong claims.
There is no public source card for this topic yet. The claims gate remains closed.