KNOWLEDGE

7-day micro-experiments

A micro-experiment is a small hypothesis tested for 7 days with simple indicators and a decision afterward.

EVIDENCEemerging

SAFETYlow

CLAIMS1

REVIEWaudited stage32

KNOWLEDGE UNIVERSE

Reflection and experiments

Journal, micro-experiments, weekly review and creation mode - where knowledge becomes practice.

4topics2protocols1experiments

Open the full area →

NEXT SMALL STEP

Micro-step

choose one variable

You can do this without starting a full protocol or experiment.

Save what you noticed This micro-step comes from this topic's own action list. No extra relationship is inferred.

What you can do

choose one variable
measure 1-3 indicators
do not change everything at once
after 7 days decide: keep, change or stop

TOPIC DEPTH / SELF-OBSERVATION

From knowledge to self-observation

This layer organizes the existing topic rules. It does not add new claims or diagnoses.

NEXT SMALL STEPRecord one observation from the last 24 hours and choose the smallest safe step.

How to observe

The minimum needed for meaningful self-observation.

your own observationyour own rating on a 1-5 scale

Topic boundaries

do not draw strong conclusions from a single day
do not promise the same result for everyone

Data limitations

Conclusions from a small number of check-ins are hypotheses.
User self-report may be incomplete or variable.
The app observes patterns; it does not confirm causes.

Interpretation limitations

Do not use this for diagnosis or treatment.
Do not promise an outcome or health improvement.
Do not strengthen wording beyond the current level of source verification.
If the user describes a health risk or crisis, the safety router takes priority.

Source limitations

Sources require manual verification before strong claims are allowed.

EVIDENCE POLICY

Use for education and self-observation, not diagnosis or treatment.

WHEN CONFIDENCE IS LOW

Suggest a small safe step and encourage observation rather than a radical change.

Human review requiredMetadata and source content are separate review stages. This profile does not unlock strong scientific wording.

EVIDENCE LAYER

Sources and limitations

0public source cards

Sources and conclusions require cautious language. This is education and self-observation, not diagnosis or treatment.

1sources assigned in the catalog

0public sources with metadata

0sources after human review in the project

0sources unlocking strong claims

Bibliographic metadata is separate from content review. Checked metadata does not unlock strong claims.

There is no public source card for this topic yet. The claims gate remains closed.

Open Evidence Library →