KNOWLEDGE

Weekly review

A weekly review combines data from check-ins, protocols and experiments while keeping uncertainty visible.

EVIDENCEemerging

SAFETYlow

CLAIMS1

REVIEWaudited stage32

KNOWLEDGE UNIVERSE

Reflection and experiments

Journal, micro-experiments, weekly review and creation mode - where knowledge becomes practice.

4topics2protocols1experiments

Open the full area →

NEXT SMALL STEP

Micro-step

check the number of days with data

You can do this without starting a full protocol or experiment.

Save what you noticed This micro-step comes from this topic's own action list. No extra relationship is inferred.

What you can do

check the number of days with data
look for recurring distractions
choose one conclusion
choose one experiment for next week

TOPIC DEPTH / SELF-OBSERVATION

From knowledge to self-observation

This layer organizes the existing topic rules. It does not add new claims or diagnoses.

NEXT SMALL STEPRecord one observation from the last 24 hours and choose the smallest safe step.

How to observe

The minimum needed for meaningful self-observation.

your own observationyour own rating on a 1-5 scale

Topic boundaries

the bot does not assume correlation means causation
the bot does not judge a person by statistics

Data limitations

Conclusions from a small number of check-ins are hypotheses.
User self-report may be incomplete or variable.
The app observes patterns; it does not confirm causes.

Interpretation limitations

Do not use this for diagnosis or treatment.
Do not promise an outcome or health improvement.
Do not strengthen wording beyond the current level of source verification.
If the user describes a health risk or crisis, the safety router takes priority.

Source limitations

Sources require manual verification before strong claims are allowed.

EVIDENCE POLICY

Use for education and self-observation, not diagnosis or treatment.

WHEN CONFIDENCE IS LOW

Suggest a small safe step and encourage observation rather than a radical change.

Human review requiredMetadata and source content are separate review stages. This profile does not unlock strong scientific wording.

EVIDENCE LAYER

Sources and limitations

0public source cards

Sources and conclusions require cautious language. This is education and self-observation, not diagnosis or treatment.

1sources assigned in the catalog

0public sources with metadata

0sources after human review in the project

0sources unlocking strong claims

Bibliographic metadata is separate from content review. Checked metadata does not unlock strong claims.

There is no public source card for this topic yet. The claims gate remains closed.

Open Evidence Library →